Community-engaged project: Zooniverse

As part of my Digital Tools and Methodologies module, we were given the task to join the people-powered research platform that goes by the name of “Zooniverse”, choose between a number of user-generated content(UCG) projects that we were personally interested in, and participate and contribute as best we could within that project.

To understand and appreciate the different objectives that each project brings, I decided to pick three projects that appeared to contrast one another. The three projects that caught my eye were: Jungle Rhythms, Chicago Wildlife Watch and Galaxy Zoo.

Screen Shot 2016-02-21 at 15.46.28

The Process

The process I undertook for each project was fairly straightforward. Each needed a volunteer with a good eye to answer a few questions, alongside a photo associated with their field of study, or topic of said project.

The project I began with, and the one I’m going to focus on in this post is Jungle Rhythms. The Jungle Rhythms project’s aim is to “try to link long term observations of tree life cycle events with weather data”, and this in turn will help specialists to understand the future of the tropical African rainforest. They are doing this by transcribing the handwritten table, that scientists stationed at the Yangambi research station in the Republic of the Congo created.

Screen Shot 2016-02-21 at 18.33.14

Summary Table

In the example I’ve placed above, we get something that looks like image (b). First of all, It asks us if the centre rectangle (the yearly section) is visible in the image displayed to us, and if pencil marks are present. Every time I repeated this process I was given a similar image so all my answers were the same. Answering “Yes” to this question, I am then met by another, but more interactive question: “Outline the centre rectangle (yearly section). Please make 6 marks total — four at the corners and two at the half-year points.”

Screen Shot 2016-02-21 at 19.06.35

Screen capture of the process

I found the next question a bit trickier, as the attributes were hard to distinguish, and some could even be dust or dirt on the transcripts. I was asked to “mark all hand-drawn pencil marks within the yearly section.” I had to mark solid lines with a red line and crosshatched lines in blue, (these indicate the presence of a life cycle event). If I came across a big X before hand written text, I was to mark it with a crosshair, (this indicates that a tree has died, or been removed from the study).

Screen Shot 2016-02-21 at 19.23.01.png

My finished result

When I completed this task, I was then given an overview of the answers I had given, and a link to talk about this specific image with others in the community, who were contributing also, if I was stuck on classifying it.

The Implications of my contribution

At the end of the FAQ on the Jungle Rhythms website, it explains what will happen with the processed data:

“After the completion of the project all data will be released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. This open source license guarantees open access to the data and derivatives.”

All of this data could in turn help researchers understand plant functioning that dates back to 1937. All of the information we provide them with from our contribution, will help them determine the dispersal potential and growth responses in a changing climate. There is an ongoing question of whether the rainforests are getting drier or wetter. According to this article, the African rainforests are getting drier as “scientists studying the trend say it’s likely to be due to natural fluctuations in the Indian and Pacific ocean temperatures which affect the climate.”

What I’ve learned & How I can apply this to my own work

I’ve learned more about the benefits of crowd-sourcing from contributing to these projects. I think that it is a completely underrated initiative, and I wasn’t aware of websites such as Zooniverse that help share these magnificent projects. I’ve also learned a lot about the processes of crunching all of this data from the various blog posts these projects have, alongside their website. From reading the blog about the process of Jungle Rhythms by Koen Hufken, It’s shown me that there’s a lot of work still to be done, even after the community has contributed.

One way of how I could apply these crowd-sourcing initiatives to my own work at the moment, would be through another module I am studying this semester. My team and I are assigned the task of creating a Data Management Plan for the Cork LGBT Archive. Part of this plan is gathering data, such as letters, images, video, audio. They have already been categorised into broad categories, but we would still have to narrow down on what information is specifically present in that data, to fully understand it. Having a crowd-sourced project set up would help the archive immensely with decreasing the work-load. Of course a review of what’s been contributed would need to be put in place, but ultimately the idea would be a great help to this project.

I enjoyed working on this assignment immensely, and the thought that I’m contributing to a good cause at the same time is very gratifying. I look forward to using this crowd-sourcing initiative in the future to create my own UCG project, or by continuing to contribute to others.



Critical Review of Storify

In this review of Storify, a content curation platform, I will critically analyse how Storify works as a research tool and as a pedagogical tool. I will also give feedback on my initial thoughts on Storify, after using it to curate content for another assignment of mine.


Launched in September 2010, Storify was initially aimed at journalists, people who are used to hours and hours of researching to find the exact information from a credible source to create the perfect story. Storify cut down those hours, and made the process simple and easy for those aspiring to be the next Anderson Cooper. As time goes on, Storify seems to be increasingly applicable in the classroom as it “helps teach students how to contextualise the streams of social media information” (Fincham, Kelly, 2011). Co-founder of Storify, Burt Herman, describes it as “21st Century wire posts that are dynamic stories that can be embedded across the web”. This platform is the future of media, and students and teachers are being encouraged to get on board with this idea as soon as they can. Curation means to merge traditional reporting with information transmitted from social media. Students now have the opportunity to delve into this activity of curation just like journalists do. The only thing they need is a Twitter and Facebook account to connect with their Storify account to be able to search. Students can now become curators, “someone who takes an inordinate mass of material, and turns chaos into order, or in a more recent slang, turns “noise into signal” “ (Guerrini, Federico, 2013). They have the opportunity to become independent storytellers, and use the vast information that they have at their fingertips to create something unique.


Some of the functions that Storify provides, will aid the average student in bypassing the everyday problems that professional journalists might come across. When searching for content through the many social media site search bars that are provided, Storify also offers the option to apply additional filters. The search results can be filtered based on whether the results have links, images, retweets and geographic location. It’s a way for students to sift through and gather material without having to do the old-fashioned research that’s impractical for a non-journalist. Herman advises students to use the user/list section to search for reliable sources first. Bill Keller, editor of The New York Times, had this to say about it – “Storify provides a filter function to filter out the poor content and unreliable sources. Students can use Storify to verify which accounts make sense. There are voices on Twitter that matter and Storify is a way of reaching them”.


Every image and text that is added to the student’s story is automatically attributable to the owner, so there is no need to worry about copyright issues. While using Storify myself, I even had the option to tweet a person, whose tweet I had embedded into my own story, to let them know that their tweet was displayed on my page.

What I found very interesting about the process of embedding information from social media platforms onto Storify was that, even if the original tweet, post, gif was deleted by the owner, it will forever stay on Storify. This platform copies over the data and stores it on their server.


A very useful feature that could be used in the classroom, is the option to comment on each paragraph and embedded element, and also share those elements on other social media platforms. This would be a great way for students to report on their peers work, and give their opinions and feedback on it, which then would engage the students in a scholarly discussion about their chosen topic. Of course, being able to post the final publication of their story on social media is a major feature, so it can reach many others with the appropriate hashtag, to encourage further debates.


What I found to be poor usability engineering regarding the Storify application, was the aggravating way that the cursor would jump back to the start of the paragraph if I clicked onto a different webpage. I found that when I came back to my Storify essay, fully rejuvenated with ideas, continuing from my unfinished sentence, that I was actually writing everything at the beginning of my paragraph instead of taking up where I left off.


Overall, I established that Storify is a great application for aspiring journalists of the Digital Age, using content curation at its core to create dynamic stories, that appeals more to the public and encourages scholarly feedback. Teachers are already getting their students involved in this curation platform to complete assignments, and to learn how to avoid unsourced opinions and speculation. Storify is a very professional platform, and I have no doubts that it will flourish in today’s society.



Crowd-Sourcing and Impact in the Humanities

I read the article “More than a business model: crowd-sourcing and impact in the humanities” by Stuart Dunn, a lecturer in Digital Humanities at King’s College London.

Crowd-Sourcing –  “the practice of obtaining needed services, ideas, or content by soliciting contributions from a large group of people and especially from the online community rather than from traditional employees or suppliers”, as explained by Merriam Webster.

In the early days of crowd-sourcing, it was focused on furthering the aims of for-profit businesses. So anyone that had access to the internet, who had a lot of time and enthusiasm, were able to participate in design competitions, micro- tasks and distributed production. The aim of this was to build on the company’s status and help them out a little bit.

Dunn wrote that  “Crowd-sourcing was about the public having impact, and reaping whatever reward the project offered – money, or the prospect of winning it, prestige, seeing your design on the mass-produced t-shirt – and not the public being impacted.” The people who are who are helping to crowd-source projects, want the companies to collaborate with them, so both parties are impacted. A survey was done for this article, and the “Super-Contributors” to these projects answered that they want to be part of the conversation, not just the process. They mostly have a desire to be useful, and see what happens on the inside, rather than being limited to just providing info and getting a fancy prize for it. They wish to learn about the content and see how the projects are organised.

Dunn gives some advice to ensure a “reciprocated impact of a humanities crowd-sourcing activity”.

  1. Not every question or problem you come across will  be susceptible to crowd-sourcing as a solution.
  2. Small groups of people have done the most valuable amount of work by sustaining their intellectual engagement throughout the project.
  3. It would be a good idea to have a contributor’s forum so that mutual problem solving is an option, by having support discussions put in place throughout the forum for particular projects. This helps to create a space full of non-institutional people working on your project, and also creates more exposure for the discussions about your project on a social media platform.

Google have recently open-sourced TensorFlow, a software library for machine learning. They hope people will contribute to the code to make their software even better, giving people a chance to make a change in machine learning.

You can find Stuart Dunn’s article “More than a business model: crowd-sourcing and impact in the humanities” Here.

Here is the TensorFlow website, where you can find more info on the project itself and why Google chose to open source it.

On Photography

I recently read “On Photography” by Susan Sontag, and I found it quite an enjoyable read. You can also read it here.

There is much to say about photography after reading the first chapter  “In Plato’s Cave”. Sontag reveals that writings, paintings and drawings about someone or an event is an interpretation, a visual statement. She claims that photography isn’t a statement about the world, it’s just pieces of it that anyone can acquire. It’s a beautiful art that surfaced around the late 1830’s, and since then most of the earlier photographs taken have been mislaid or torn, because they need to be preserved to last long.  Hence why photos were printed in books, but Sontag believes that because of this, the photo loses it’s quality.

Since photos are found almost anywhere now, in films, galleries and books, there is confusion of how to view the images correctly. I believe there is no wrong way to view an image, but in Chris Marker’s film “Si j’avais quatre dromadaires “(1966), he tells exactly how much time to spend on each photo, and the order he wants you to view them in. He want’s the viewer to gain in visual legibility and emotional impact, and I think this is a beautiful thing.

How is it that if someone tells us something, most of the time we don’t believe them unless they have photographic evidence? Well this is another point Sontag makes, that photographs show a form of truth, evidence. When we want to travel to another country, we need a passport, and that passport needs photographic evidence, signed by the civil force of a state, to prove that it’s actually you. Same goes for trying to get into a club that’s over 18’s. To prove you’re of age, you need an image of yourself  stating your date of birth. June 1871, the Paris Police used this method to catch murderers. Photography incriminates, but also justifies.

At the start of photography, much like the start of computers, it only had the Inventors and experts to use them, and they were expensive enough that only the rich could have them. No amateur could work it. Nowadays every amateur has a camera as part of their smartphone, and has the power to capture everything and anything they want. Although sometimes, this is not a good thing.

Photography has become one of the principal devices for experiencing something. Giving an appearance of participation. Most people can’t go anywhere nowadays, without getting the urge to show everyone what they’re experiencing. Like those people who have over 100 seconds on their Snapchat story of: A concert, a night out, or plain old “banter”. You know who you are.

Tourists using this method of taking pictures of everything while on holiday, has been found to be a method of working, while not working. In this day and age it is unnatural to go away without having a camera. It calms them to take pictures of the beautiful scenes rather than take it all in themselves. They put the camera between themselves and the remarkable scenery.

Sontag states that photography holds a form of Immortality. After the event ends, the picture still exists. This is how history can resonate with  us, we feel empathy towards horrific images of events that have unfolded in another country, or era. For example, the images of the Bergen Belsen and Dachau concentration camps. The writer describes of how seeing these images at the age of 12, changed their perspective on everything.

I love taking photographs as way of documenting my life, like everyone else really. We often take this luxury for granted. After reading On Photography, I know I’m going to be more aware in the future by noticing these aspects of photography, and maybe be a little wary of what I post.

WARNING: Disturbing Images. Here are the images of  the Bergen Belsen and Dachau concentration camps.

“A Cyborg Manifesto” – Donna Haraway

My immediate reaction to Donna Haraway’s “Cyborg Manifesto” was that of complete perplexity. Her style of writing and language was hard to grasp, but throughout reading it, I seemed to be able to piece a few things together to get the big picture. The big picture mainly being, that the cyborg/human hybrid is and will be the next organism in overcoming racism, sexism etc. and destroying labels regarding gender, religion and history.

Now saying that, Haraway did only start writing this in 1983, and it was published by 1985 for the world to see, so to say she was a woman ahead of her time, is an understatement, as this women almost predicted the future. As a child who grew up in the Digital Age, it’s easy for me to comprehend that there would be such forms of Artificial Intelligence created, but it is peculiar to see such ideas being thought of back then.

I was confused as to what this whole cyborg idea had to do with socialist feminism, but Haraway makes it clear that cyborgs don’t judge each other based on ethnicity, beliefs ( feminism) or stereo-types. So to become a cyborg, means, to become acceptable to all, and this is the step forward that she wants us to take. Haraway’s belief of feminism is that it should be about equality , where both man and woman are equal, not the woman trying to seek a place higher than the man. Cyborgs, according to Haraway, think in terms of equality.

Although, I do have a concern with this. Haraway’s defines a cyborg as being ” a cybernetic organism, a hybrid of machine and organism, a creature of social reality as well as a creation of fiction”. The new age machines cannot be considered as just appearing artificial anymore. There is no boundary between natural and artificial. Cyborgs lose some aspects of what makes us human, and even she describes them as “monstrous”, leading us to believe that they could do more harm than good. The human traits that are removed, are removed to ensure control.

In this article I found on sexism in the world of AI, it describes how it’s mainly men are building AI’s, and the effect this will have won’t be a good one if we don’t have a woman’s input. It explains how Artificial Intelligence research has drifted from the focus of how technology can improve people’s lives. This is Haraway’s goal, but we seem to be straying from it. “Many women are driven by the desire to do work that benefits their communities, Men tend to be more interested in questions about algorithms and mathematical properties.” [Marie desJardins, 2015]

“Robotics and artificial intelligence don’t just need more women—they need more diversity across the board”  [Sarah Todd, 2015]

Inside the surprisingly sexist world of artificial intelligence – Sarah Todd, 2015.

Marie desJardins, a professor of computer science at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, whose research focuses on machine learning and intelligent decision-making.

Critical Discourse in Digital Humanities

I recently read the article “Critical Discourse in Digital Humanities” by Fred Gibbs. The three main points he has made are :

1. “Digital humanists have not created an effective critical discourse around their work.”

2. “We need more theoretical and practical rubrics for evaluating digital humanities work.”

3. “Digital humanities work requires a different kind of peer review to produce effective criticism.”

  • Firstly, he explains how digital humanities is very different from the humanities, which leads to the need for different ways of evaluating work that humanists are unfamiliar with. A critical discourse has not been made for digital humanists to criticise each others’ work. The digital humanities community has been supportive, and slow to appear unwelcoming. Although Gibbs claims we do criticize our peer’s work, it’s a public opinion that is most useful, from those outside of the digital humanities. We need to explain what is good, and what is not good and why.
  • Secondly, Gibbs explains that a critical discourse needs to be concerned with both interpretation and evaluation. He doesn’t want to see an astounding visualisation that has no meaning behind it. He also explains how the ways that old critics criticised, are needed along with the ways of critics nowadays in this new critical discourse that we are seeking. Nowadays we judge something whether it is good or bad. Back then, things were criticised based on “knowledge, disinterestedness, love, insight, style.” Gibbs tells us we are better off to evaluate things according to Barbara Herrnstein Smith, by  integrity, boundaries, coherence, features, qualities, categories to which it belongs and properties that make it what it is. So, he outlines a few of his own categories that he believes should be the criteria for critical discourse:   Transparency – to see if we can really understand what’s happening. Resusability – is there an option to export this data so other digital humanists can apply it to their projects. Data – so that it’s visible to the world and not hidden, and can be tested. Design – the medium is the message, but the decisions behind it count also.
  • Lastly, he explains that digital projects need to be published publicly for it to receive the relevant scholarly discourse. Gibbs is saying that we need a whole broader audience to do the criticising because digital humanities is a broad subject that embodies interdisciplinary practices that can’t make it alright to use the same old models of critique. The most expressive critique is one that discusses the unique characteristics and style of the creator that is reflected from their work.

This was an interesting read as a student studying Digital Humanities, it showed me how I can effectively criticise my own work, and my peer’s work so we can improve it according to the criteria stated above.

Deploying Gallery on to my Server

For my fourth Digital Humanities assignment, the goal my class and I have, is to familiarise ourselves with the deployment of a web service on to our server space. This in turn, should help us appreciate all the work that goes into creating such applications and understand how they work.

Firstly, I had to purchase server space from a website called Reclaim Hosting. It was 25 dollars(which was around €23 for me), and that was the cost for a student & individuals annual subscription.

From the Reclaim Hosting cPanel, I searched through a series of web applications, trying to find what looked appealing. I decided to choose from the Photos and Files section, and searched through each application’s description to see which one suited my taste the best.

In the end I decided to go with Gallery, as it seemed simple and attractive. The showcase section on their description page helped me decide to go with that application also, because it showcased some websites that are powered by Gallery. Other applications didn’t have this available so it appealed to me that Gallery did. It seemed professional.

Screen Shot 2015-04-10 at 13.24.12

What is the purpose of the service or application you have chosen?

The purpose of Gallery is to provide a space for people on the internet so that they can add photos and make albums and share these with other users. The company describes it as “the next generation of open source photo sharing web applications”. Comments are also enabled, so this gives the users a chance to comment on each others posts.

Why are you interested in it?

I’m a very visual person, so anything with images are an instant appeal. Gallery is almost like any photo sharing application out there ; Facebook, Pinterest, Instagram, etc. And since these web service’s have done so well around the world, I think it’s safe to say that people love to share photos with everyone else. Whether it be “selfies” or a beautiful landscape, or a moment that’s been snapped with the perfect timing.

How is it or might it be applicable to something you may do in the future? 

I might transform this web service into the most amazing website ever. Who knows? I certainly don’t. But I do know that I have this at my fingertips now, and the choice is endless. I like the idea of an open source photo sharing application on my website. It could be one part of the many areas I will have on ( Don’t judge, I couldn’t think of anything else! ). People could share photo’s of themselves with my product, the nosePhone, that transmits smells through text! Or people could be joining in on my exciting journey of travelling the world by sending in their images of them exploring! The list is endless.

What steps were involved in the deployment process?

To be honest, the deployment process of this tool was the easiest part of this whole assignment ( Giving away my money being the hardest part ). All that was needed to do was to click on the “Install this application” button, and you were good to go! It’s only 16MB so no harm done there. I clicked onto my webpage, and the homepage for Gallery was set as my webpage. I logged in, and it named me as the Gallery Administrator ( I felt very fancy ).

What technologies are used and had to be configured to deploy your chosen application?

I had everything I needed, working with a OS X Yosemite Macbook Air. Although, when I go into the option to add  photos an alert comes up to tell me that “Movie uploading is disabled on your system, Help!” I clicked on the help button and it told me that, to upload videos my system “needs the FFmpeg toolkit to extract thumbnails and size information from them”. You have the option of downloading it, but I didn’t feel the need to as images are all I’m interested in at the moment.

Who would benefit from access to such a service/application?

Well firstly, I would benefit from it, in regard to what I mentioned earlier with it being applicable to something I may do in the future. But I also think anyone that has an interest in photo sharing would benefit greatly from it. The layout isn’t as clean and pristine as the almighty Instagram, but it certainly has room to improve, and the potential to be a great application.

I’ve learned a lot from partaking in the deployment of a tool on my newly owned web server. Now I know for myself what goes on behind the webpages, rather than just being the user than signs in, I’m now an Administrator!

Open Street Map – Review

As part of my second assignment for my Digital Tools and Methodologies module, we were told to review OpenStreetMap. This is an open source mapping website that allows registered users to contribute to the website. If you’re not signed up, then all you can do is view what has been contributed by many others.

My process: 

First of all, I visited to learn how to edit the map. Like any new toy, you read the instructions first. It was very visual, which I found to be extremely helpful.

I decided to start off with my own hometown, since I would have more information about it, but it seemed to be mapped pretty well. My own estate was mapped but wasn’t named, so I decided to add that in. My area mustn’t have been updated in quite a while because Eddie Rockets, in Blackpool, has been replaced by a diner called Rockin’ Joes. So I made a few changes, also moving Lifestyle sports to the correct building.

I then decided to see if my primary school and secondary school in Glanmire were mapped. This area didn’t seem like a lot of focus went into it. My primary school wasn’t even acknowledged, so I decided to add it in.Screen Shot 2015-03-06 at 12.19.00Screen Shot 2015-03-06 at 12.18.45

Then I checked my secondary school and realised that there was a “h” missing at the end of the name, so I fixed that. Also, the school cafeteria was named as a gym so I had to change that, and I also added in the swimming pool as a building.

Screen Shot 2015-03-06 at 12.23.25

Going through this whole process I’ve noticed a few pros and a few cons.


  • The user interface is attractive, and is very visual with icons.
  • The tools, eg: using a polygon to add a line or area, is very easy to use.
  • It allows anyone to contribute, once they have an account.
  • There is a delay from when you change something, to when it actually appears on the map for viewers, because it has to be reviewed. So information added as a joke, won’t be as funny if it takes a while to show.
  • Various options to choose from, to describe the area/building you’re mapping


  • As it is a crowd sourcing project, it allows anyone to contribute, once they have an account. Which in result, could lead to a lot of wrong information being added.
  • Whatever you add, can be changed by another person that might think that they’re right.

What i’ve learned from this experience: 

I’ve learned how to use this mapping tool, by reading the guidelines and contributing my bit to this project. It’s helped me understand the importance of mapping things correctly, because tourists or even local people that want to find their way around their area , could get lost. And also, the importance of leaving the correct information behind us, because this could be used in the future.

This is the third mapping tool i’ve encountered during my time in this Digital humanities module. I also did a review for my first assignment on a mapping tool called SepiaTown. Mapping tools seem to have grown because of the amount of interest invested in them. People like to know where things are.

How you feel you might be able to apply the spatial or the crowdsourced initiatives in your own work – now or in the future: 

I will be able to use SepiaTown in the future if i’m ever looking for a historical image that applies to whatever project i’m involved in.

I’m not sure yet what I would use Open Street Map for, but it’s seems like a reliable enough source that I could use any data it displays and be sure that it’s credible. Thus, using it in whatever project i’m involved in.

I do find these digital mapping tools to be very interesting, and I’m positive I will be searching for more spatial and crowdsourced initiatives to expand my knowledge for future projects of mine.

Review of SepiaTown

Assignment 1: Reviewing a DH Tool

Megan Desmond

The Digital Humanities Tool that I have chosen to review for this assignment is SepiaTown.

Gathering Information

SepiaTown is an online digital tool that maps historical images around the world. It’s as they describe it, “a cultural history project”. The makers of this Website’s goal is to “provide a window to the past by merging photography, Geography and Technology, as well as a forum for institutions and individuals to share and map historical images”.

I found this Digital Tool in the DIRT Directory when I browsed through the “Mapping” category. I clicked the link that was provided, , and it brought me straight to the SepiaTown website.

I checked the site’s identity by viewing the site’s information, to the left of the URL, and it stated that the site hasn’t provided the browser with a certificate. However, this is deemed as “normal for regular HTTP sites because certificates are usually provided only if the site uses SSL.

While I was registering, it asked me if I was an organization, and if so, to state my number, web-address, address, and to give them a description of the type of organization or collector that we were, or collection that we had.

SepiaTown is a website that has an interactive Google-Map displayed on the homepage, which allows you to search for historical images all over the world, in the exact place that they were taken then. They love to describe them as “Then & Now” images.

The site has a great layout, and provides any information possible that is frequently searched by users. It even has it’s very own Image Guidelines as to who can upload and what can be uploaded. They have strict rules that either you have to be the copyright holder of the image to upload it onto the website, or the image is in the public domain, has been given a creative commons licenses which would make it acceptable to upload and that you follow all the protocols of that license.

In regards to what can be uploaded, a picture more recent than 1985 is not acceptable, taking in the fact we’re in 2015 now. They like the image age to be at least 30. When uploading your image, they would prefer the image to be placed accurately on the map. If the image is a portrait, it either has to display a good amount of the location, or of a person of significant historical interest to be added to the SepiaTown map. Any graphic subject matter (Violence/Sexual Imagery) is rarely allowed, but, as I will state later in regard to a Road Map, they hope to build a filtering system that will allow the upload of images from an important part of history, that naturally would be inappropriate for certain ages.

When you’ve followed these guidelines, each image you upload gets it’s own page and permanent URL, along with it’s own comments section and a “share link”. If you come across a photo that doesn’t match the criteria, or a problem with the website, you can report it on the Report a Problem page.

There is a Latest Uploads page that lets you view what’s been recently added onto the interactive map around the world.

When I searched for Research Articles on this tool, I used the search engines Google Scholar, and DuckDuckGo, and all that arose was small reviews from magazines that SepiaTown had previously linked to their page in their Press section. All were good, but none fit my criteria of being a “research” article. I changed my wording to a “discussion” about the tool, and I found this small, but useful review from a website called . This teacher showed their take on the tool, and said that it would be perfect for a projector/interactive whiteboard while teaching a class like history, or before they would go on field trips, so they could view the “Then & Now” pictures.

Maturity/stability of the tool

From my research, the tool was made in 2010, and looks somewhat the same as it did then, feature-wise. But, in the FAQ section of SepiaTown’s page, there is a title called “The Future of SepiaTown”. They state that they are working hard as we speak, on several new features that will make the user’s experience better, from Improved search capabilities and uploader profiles, to a cool new mapping game.

The creators, Jon Protas, Eric Warren, and Eric Lehnartz, believe that SepiaTown is still in it’s “infancy”, and in the coming months it will be growing in it’s scope and offerings. Their Roadmap for the future entails an enhanced member presence within the core SepiaTown website by:

having greater community interaction opportunities, embedded SepiaTown technology for member websites, more options for uploaded media types, a mobile experience, and opportunities for members to generate revenues by leveraging their archives”. So there isn’t an app for phones or tablets at the moment, but the process of making one has begun, with on-location viewing becoming available in the near future.

Sustainability of the tool

As I stated above, the tool has been available since 2010, along with the creation of the tool’s social media pages. It doesn’t seem that they have a strong community supporting them in relation to the amount of followers or “likes” that they have built up over the years. Their twitter page @SepiaTown has 524 followers, and their last tweet was May 2014. That’s nearly a full year ago, so they don’t seem to have the urge to build this website, as they claim they do on their own website, which was last updated Jan 2015. They have a collective 1,361 likes on Facebook which their last update on that was March 2012, and on Pinterest they have 27 followers in total. Not much for an up and coming tool. They also have a blog, that they link on their own website with their Twitter and Facebook, and their last blogpost was Jan 2012.

SepiaTown is not an open-source website where you can contribute code to their page to improve it, however you cam contribute photos that you own, to help build the website even more.

There is no export tool on this website. It’s an online based mapping tool that you’ll have to connect to the internet to experience it’s features.

Sustainability of your research

This website is information filled, with how-to’s on everything you need to know about the site and using it. So it’s very clear to the user straight away how easy this tool is, and enjoyable at the same time.

I was confused at first how to even work out what to click on this website, because there’s so much going on, on the screen. But I was steered in the right direction by the information toolbar on the top right-hand corner, which told me everything I needed to know and answered any question I had previously thought. Everything I have stated is verifiable and reproducible and you can see for yourself if you visit the website, or the research articles I have mentioned.

Finishing my research on this tool, I evaluated how unique it is, and how much it would appeal to the common history enthusiast or even a life enthusiast. It displays the impact history had on certain buildings, the role science had on technology. For example, in images these days you’d see cars, telephone wires, etc. The difference between culture and dress sense would be astounding to notice if you were never born in that era, and if you were, the nostalgia would come flooding back. Since learning about all the new features that are to come from this tool, I’m even more intrigued than I was to begin with and I’m looking forward to see what the future holds for SepiaTown.